Trademark Licensing

Unlock Your Brand’s Potential: Discover How an Experienced Law Firm Can Propel Your Trademark Licensing to Success!

For the trademark owner, licensing can be a real moneymaker through royalty payments. Done right, a licensing program can also strengthen your brand by placing it on new products, services, or markets. This broader exposure can boost brand awareness and open doors to new business opportunities.

For example, imagine you own a popular clothing brand. Licensing your trademark to a company in another country allows them to sell your clothes there, using your established brand recognition. This can be a great way to enter new markets, especially those with challenging legal or political hurdles. Similarly, you could license your brand to a company specializing in a specific market segment, like children’s clothing, leveraging their expertise to reach a new audience.

There’s another perk for the licensor (trademark owner): U.S. law requires using a trademark to keep its rights. So, by having a licensee use your trademark, it helps you register the mark and maintain those rights, even if you weren’t actively using it yourself.

Now, let’s look at the upside for the licensee. A trademark license can be a great way to add a new revenue stream. They can leverage their existing infrastructure, like employees and manufacturing, to create products with your established brand, without needing to build everything from scratch. Depending on the agreement, the licensee might also benefit from associating their brand with yours, boosting their own recognition.

Trademark licensing can even be a solution for trademark disputes. Imagine two companies using the same trademark – maybe one started using it first, but the other has a stronger brand. They could work out a deal where the original user keeps ownership (assigns it), but licenses it back to the other company for continued use. This keeps the trademark with the rightful owner while allowing the other company to keep using it.

Trademark Licensing in Action: Real-World Examples

Trademark licensing is a versatile tool used in many situations. Here are some common scenarios:

  • Manufacturing muscle: Imagine a popular sports team lacks the resources to make its own branded merchandise. They can license a clothing company to produce jerseys, hats, and other items featuring the team logo. This allows the team to expand its brand reach without the burden of manufacturing.
  • Brand Expansion: A well-known restaurant chain might license its brand to a food manufacturer. This manufacturer could then produce frozen meals using the restaurant’s name and logo, allowing the restaurant to enter the grocery store market without setting up its own production and distribution network.
  • Double the Power: Co-branding allows two companies to combine their brand power. For example, imagine an outdoor apparel brand partnering with a car company to create a limited edition “adventure vehicle” featuring logos from both companies.
  • Ingredient Impact: Think of a brand like Teflon, known for its non-stick coatings. Teflon might license its trademark to cookware manufacturers. Consumers, recognizing the Teflon brand, might be more likely to purchase cookware featuring it.
  • The Franchise Advantage: Franchising relies heavily on trademark licensing. A franchisee, like a Subway store owner, receives permission (license) to use the franchisor’s (Subway) brand name and operating procedures in exchange for a fee. 

The Downside of Trademark Licensing: Risks for the Licensor

Trademark licensing can be a win-win, but there are potential pitfalls for the company lending its brand (licensor). The biggest concern? Damage to their valuable trademark.

Here’s how a licensee’s actions can hurt the licensor’s brand:

  • Quality Quandaries: The biggest risk is the licensee using the trademark on products or services with different quality standards than the licensor’s. Imagine a beloved restaurant brand licensing its name to frozen meals. If the meals are bad, it can damage the reputation of both the frozen meals and the restaurant itself. The opposite can also be true! If the frozen meals are amazing, but the restaurant serves average food, consumers might get confused and think they’re not connected.

Quality Control is Key: To avoid these issues, licensors need to have strong quality control measures written into the licensing agreement and strictly enforced. This means having the right to approve how the trademark is used at every stage, including by distributors, manufacturers, and even sub-licensees (companies the licensee partners with).

Liability Concerns: Protecting Your Brand

Beyond quality control, liability is another risk for the licensor. Imagine that our example of licensed frozen meals made someone sick due to food contamination. This could damage the reputation of both the restaurant brand and the frozen meals. In some cases, the licensor (restaurant) could even be held liable for injuries caused by the licensed product (frozen meals).

To manage this risk, the licensing agreement should clearly state who is responsible for what. This is typically done through an indemnification clause. This clause basically says that the licensee (frozen meal company) agrees to financially cover the licensor (restaurant) for any legal claims arising from the licensee’s actions. The agreement should also allow the licensor to terminate the license if something happens that could lead to a liability claim.

Getting Stuck in the Middle: Market Risks for Both Sides

Both the licensor (brand owner) and licensee (company using the brand) face market risks in a trademark licensing agreement.

Licensor Woes: The Handcuff Effect

Imagine granting a company exclusive rights to sell your products in a specific market, but they don’t put in the effort to promote them. This can leave you stuck, unable to work with other companies who might do a better job. To avoid this, licensors should:

  • Set Term Limits: Don’t get locked into a super long agreement with a lackluster licensee.
  • Minimum Sales Requirements: Include goals for the licensee to meet, ensuring they actively sell your products.
  • Termination Clauses: Make sure you can break the agreement if the licensee isn’t performing.

Before signing any deal, conduct due diligence on potential licensees. Make sure they have the experience and resources to effectively promote your brand.

Licensee Risks: Flops and Lost Brands

Being a licensee isn’t without risks either:

  • Unsuccessful Products: Even with your best effort, the licensed product might not sell well. Make sure the agreement allows you to terminate it if things aren’t working, and avoid clauses requiring minimum royalties regardless of sales.
  • Losing the Trademark: What happens if the licensor loses their trademark rights? The agreement should address this scenario, and you might need to stop using the brand altogether. Rebranding can be expensive, so be sure this is covered in the agreement.

Gray Market Goods are genuine products, but not intended for your specific market. Their presence can hurt your sales. The agreement should ideally require the licensor to police the trademark and prevent unauthorized distribution or poor-quality products from other licensees impacting your sales.

By negotiating these points you can protect yourself, while also benefiting the licensor by ensuring a strong brand reputation.

Both Sides: The Bankruptcy Maze

Both parties face the risk of bankruptcy. While licensing agreements often allow for termination in case of bankruptcy, these clauses might be unenforceable under U.S. bankruptcy law. Consulting with a lawyer can help you navigate these complexities.

Licensee Beware: Bankruptcy and Trademarks

Bankruptcy throws a curveball into trademark licensing agreements for licensees (companies using the brand). Here’s the backstory:

  • In the past, a bankrupt licensor (brand owner) could terminate a licensing agreement and prevent the licensee from using the trademark. This was a major risk for licensees.
  • Congress stepped in with the Intellectual Property Licenses in Bankruptcy Act (IPLBA) to protect licensees of certain intellectual property in bankruptcy situations. However, trademarks were not included in this protection.
  • The Supreme Court eventually ruled in Mission Prod. Holdings v. Tempnology that a bankrupt licensor rejecting a trademark license agreement basically breaches the contract, but doesn’t erase it. This means the licensee may still have the right to use the trademark.
  • But here’s the catch: a licensee’s right to use the trademark after a bankruptcy might still be limited by state law or the specific wording of the licensing agreement.

In short, bankruptcy adds complexity. As a licensee, consulting with a lawyer is important to understand your rights in this situation.

The Other Side of the Coin: Bankruptcy Risks for Licensors (Brand Owner)

Bankruptcy isn’t just a concern for licensees (company using the brand). Licensors (brand owner) also face challenges if their licensee goes bankrupt.

Here’s the scenario:

  • Imagine your licensing agreement with a company allows them to use your trademark. If that company files for bankruptcy, they might be able to assign that agreement (and the right to use your trademark) to another company under Section 365 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
  • This could be a problem if the new company is a competitor or otherwise not someone you want representing your brand.

There are some limitations on licensees assigning these agreements in bankruptcy:

  • The licensee must fix any past issues with the agreement (prepetition defaults) and convince the court they can perform their obligations in the future (adequate assurance of future performance).
  • They can’t assign the agreement if certain laws (applicable non-bankruptcy law) or the original agreement itself prohibits such an assignment, and you (the licensor) don’t agree to it.

However, it’s important to note that some courts have ruled that exclusive and non-exclusive trademark licenses can’t be assigned under federal law, offering some potential protection for licensors.

In conclusion, bankruptcy can make things messy for licensors too. Consulting with a lawyer can help you understand your rights and options in such a situation.

Licensee Beware:
Challenging the Brand You Use (Licensee Estoppel)

As a licensee (company using the brand), there’s a concept called licensee estoppel that can limit your ability to challenge the validity of the trademark you’re using. Basically, you agree to use the trademark, so you can’t argue it’s not a valid trademark in the first place. This estoppel (legal block) applies to you, the licensee, but not necessarily to other companies.

There are some exceptions to licensee estoppel:

  • New Information: You might be able to challenge the trademark’s validity based on events that happened after your licensing agreement ended.
  • No Real Trademark: If the license agreement grants you rights to something that isn’t really a trademark (a “naked license”), you might be able to challenge it.
  • Certification Marks: These are special trademarks that indicate a product or service meets certain standards. There might be more leeway to challenge the validity of a certification mark.

To be extra sure, some licensors include a “no-contest” clause in the agreement. This clause basically says you officially agree not to challenge the validity of the trademark. Be aware, these clauses are only enforceable while the agreement is active, unless the agreement says otherwise.

Trademark Licenses vs. Franchise Agreements: Understanding the Key Differences

While both involve using a brand (trademark), there’s a big difference between a trademark license agreement and a franchise agreement. Here’s a breakdown to help you tell them apart:

Considering the Law

When drafting or reviewing either agreement, you’ll need to consider various legal areas like contracts, intellectual property, and potentially franchise law.

What is a Franchise?

Franchises are a specific type of business arrangement governed by federal law, state franchise statutes, and even international laws. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) defines a franchise as having three key requirements:

  1. Sharing a Brand: The franchisor provides a trademark or other branding element to the franchisee.
  2. Control and Support: The franchisor exerts significant control or offers substantial assistance in how the franchisee operates their business.
  3. Financial Commitment: The franchisee pays a minimum fee (currently $570) within the first six months.

Key Distinction: Control

Here’s the crucial difference:

  • Every Franchise Agreement is a Trademark License Agreement: Because franchises involve sharing a brand (trademark), they inherently include a trademark license.
  • Not Every Trademark License is a Franchise: A simple agreement to use a trademark doesn’t necessarily involve the level of control or support required for a franchise.

Understanding this distinction is crucial to ensure both parties comply with the relevant laws.

Franchise Regulations

Franchise laws can be complex, but here’s a basic idea of what franchisors might need to do:

  • State Registration: Register with the state(s) where the franchisee will operate (usually for a small fee).
  • Disclosure Documents: Provide detailed information about their business to franchisees before signing the agreement.
  • Agreement Approval: In some cases, submit the franchise agreement terms for state approval.

Non-Compliance Risks

Failing to comply with franchise laws can lead to trouble for both franchisors and franchisees:

  • Legal Action: The FTC or state regulators might take civil or criminal action against the franchisor and involved individuals.
  • Contract Challenges: Franchisees might be able to void the agreement, seek compensation, or get other forms of relief.

Understanding the difference between trademark licenses and franchise agreements is essential. If you’re unsure which type of agreement you need, consulting with a lawyer is recommended.

The Tightrope Walk: Balancing Control and Franchise Laws in Trademark Licensing

Trademark licenses and franchise agreements share a common thread: brand usage. However, the level of control the licensor (brand owner) exerts over the licensee (company using the brand) is the key difference. Here’s how to navigate this sometimes tricky area:

Control vs. Quality Concerns

A licensor needs some control to ensure quality and protect their trademark. Imagine a licensor allowing a company to use their brand on low-quality products. This could damage the reputation of both the brand and the licensed products.

The “Significant Control” Zone

The problem arises when the licensor’s control becomes too much, potentially triggering franchise laws. According to the FTC’s Franchise Rule Compliance Guide, a franchisor’s control is considered “significant” if the franchisee heavily relies on them to operate the business. This reliance is more likely if:

  • The franchisee is new to the business and lacks experience.
  • The franchisee is taking on a significant financial risk.

Keeping it a License, Not a Franchise

Here’s how a licensor can avoid crossing the line into franchise territory:

  • Focus on Brand and Quality: Limit your control to areas directly related to using the trademark and maintaining quality standards for the licensed products or services. Don’t dictate the licensee’s overall operations like marketing plans, staffing, or accounting practices.
  • Independent Suppliers: Don’t require the licensee to purchase supplies from you or your affiliates. They should be free to choose their own suppliers.
  • Straightforward Royalties: Structure your royalty fees to be based on sales or usage, not a separate upfront fee for the right to sell the product.

Balancing control and legal compliance can be tricky. If you’re unsure about the level of control appropriate for your trademark license agreement, consulting with a lawyer is recommended.

Franchise Loopholes: Exemptions and the Risks of Informal Agreements

There can be some wiggle room even when franchise laws seem to apply to your trademark license agreement. Here’s a breakdown of some potential exemptions:

Exemptions for Sophisticated Investors:

  • Large Investment Exemption: If the initial investment is over $1.1 million (excluding land and franchisor financing), this exemption might apply.
  • Large Franchisee Exemption: Selling a franchise to someone with at least 5 years of experience and a net worth exceeding $5.7 million might qualify for this exemption.

Other Exemptions

  • Fractional Franchise Exemption: This applies if the franchise makes up less than 20% of the franchisee’s existing business, which is similar to the franchisor’s business.

The Dangers of Informal Agreements

While written agreements are ideal, trademark licenses can sometimes be formed through:

  • Implied License: This happens when a trademark owner lets someone use their trademark without a formal agreement. For example, a non-profit might allow another organization to use their logo on a website, only requiring non-commercial use. This could be seen as an implied license.
  • Oral Agreements: These can be risky because there’s no clear record of what both parties agreed to. misunderstandings can lead to disputes and potential legal trouble for the licensee (company using the brand).

While exemptions exist, it’s always best to consult with a lawyer to determine if franchise laws apply to your specific situation. Written agreements are essential to avoid confusion and potential legal issues down the road.

Why Written Trademark License Agreements
Are Your Friend

While you can technically have a trademark license agreement through spoken word (oral agreements) or simply by letting someone use your trademark (implied licenses), they are risky and can lead to trouble down the road. Here’s why a written agreement is essential:

The Dangers of Vagueness

  • Scope of Use: An oral or implied agreement might not specify exactly how the licensee can use the trademark. Can they use it on clothing? Hats? Purses? A written agreement clears up any confusion.
  • Termination: Without a written agreement, either party can terminate the license at any time, potentially jeopardizing the licensee’s investment in building the brand.
  • Territory: Where can the licensee use the trademark? A written agreement defines the geographic territory to avoid conflicts if you grant a similar license to someone else in a different area.

Quality Control Concerns

Imagine a scenario where you let someone use your trademark without a written agreement. They then start using it on low-quality products. This can damage the reputation of your brand. Written agreements often include quality control provisions to help protect your trademark.

The Importance of Clarity

A written trademark license agreement spells out everything clearly, reducing the risk of misunderstandings and potential lawsuits between you and the licensee.

The Bottom Line

While oral and implied licenses can exist, they are fraught with uncertainty and risk. To protect yourself and ensure a smooth business relationship, always put your trademark license agreements in writing.

The Power of Two:
Understanding Brand Collaborations

What are Brand Collaborations?

Brand collaborations (or brand partnerships) occur when two or more companies join forces on a marketing campaign, product launch, or other project. By combining their resources, ideas, and customer bases, they aim to create something more exciting and impactful than either could achieve alone.

Why Collaborate?

There are several reasons brands choose to collaborate:

  • Reach a Wider Audience: Partnerships allow brands to tap into each other’s customer base, effectively reaching new people who might not have been familiar with their brand before.
  • Shared Resources: Collaboration can be a cost-effective way to achieve marketing goals. Partners can share the financial burden and resources required for a project.
  • Boost Credibility: A lesser-known brand can gain instant credibility by partnering with a well-established brand.
  • Innovation: Collaboration can spark new ideas and lead to innovative products or services that excite consumers.

Types of Brand Collaborations

Brand collaborations can take many forms, here are a few examples:

  • Product Collabs: Two brands co-create a unique product, like a special edition sneaker or a clothing line designed by a celebrity.
  • Marketing Campaigns: Brands partner on a marketing blitz, combining their creative forces for a specific advertising push.
  • Experiential Events: Partners co-host events or pop-up shops to create a unique experience for consumers.

Challenges and Considerations

While brand collaborations offer many benefits, there are also challenges to consider:

  • Brand Alignment: Partners should have compatible brand images and target audiences to ensure a successful collaboration.
  • Division of Responsibilities: A clear agreement outlining roles, responsibilities, and profit-sharing is essential.
  • Creative Control: Partners need to establish how creative decisions will be made to avoid creative roadblocks.

Brand collaborations can be a powerful marketing tool, but careful planning and execution are necessary for success. By understanding the potential benefits and challenges, brands can leverage collaborations to achieve their marketing goals.

Affordable Legal Support at Fixed Costs

Get your business off the ground with our Starter Package. 

We provide tailored solutions to meet your legal needs, all at a fixed cost. 

No surprises, just efficient support.

Carbon Law Group -Legal Services